From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unify on encoding Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:29:30 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200203172228.g2HMSvX26032@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016433216 25038 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2002 06:33:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16mqi8-0006Vk-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:33:36 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16mqmu-0006EP-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:38:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mqhh-0001bl-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mqfI-00008p-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:30:41 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA05074; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:29:30 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200203172228.g2HMSvX26032@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:1998 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1998 On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > A second request (but separate) is whether there is any objection to removing > the ability to turn off unify-8859-on-encoding-mode. FWIW, I object in principle to removing user options, especially for brand-new features we never tested in a public release. I think we should revisit this specific issue after Emacs 21.3 is released and used for a while, based on user reports. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel