From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: Kenichi Handa <handa@etl.go.jp>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:11:30 +0200 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020225170826.4538C-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200202251459.g1PEx7O16870@rum.cs.yale.edu>
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Here the user visited the file with Latin-2, then changed the file's
> > encoding on disk into UTF-8, then reverted the buffer. Should Emacs
> > autodetect in this case or not?
>
> I don't think it matters since both options can make sense depending
> on the context.
Yes, that was my point. We've been around these issues more than once,
and the conclusion always was that the current default is no worse than
the other possibilities. So we decided not to change the current
behavior.
> Prompting the user is another option.
Perhaps as an option, and only in interactive invocation of
revert-buffer; otherwise I'm afraid some VC-related commands will become
a nuisance.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 7:01 [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 10:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-25 11:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25 7:25 ` Miles Bader
2002-02-25 9:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 22:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 15:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-28 4:08 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 11:58 Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-23 20:19 Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1020225170826.4538C-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).