unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: Kenichi Handa <handa@etl.go.jp>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:03:28 +0200 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020225115618.1432B-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200202250724.g1P7OVR14692@rum.cs.yale.edu>


On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> Looks like we should remember whether the current coding-system was
> automatically inferred or whether it was explicitly specified.

I'm not sure it's enough.  Imagine the following sequence of commands:

	C-x RET c latin-2 RET C-x C-f some-file RET
	M-! cat some-file | recode latin-2..utf-8 > some-file RET
	M-x revert-buffer RET

Here the user visited the file with Latin-2, then changed the file's 
encoding on disk into UTF-8, then reverted the buffer.  Should Emacs 
autodetect in this case or not?

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-25 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-25  7:01 [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25  7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 10:03   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-02-25 10:31     ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-25 11:04       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 14:59     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 15:11       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13     ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:42       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-27  5:50         ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25  7:25 ` Miles Bader
2002-02-25  9:56   ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13     ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:44       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 22:44         ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-27  5:50           ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 15:08             ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-28  4:08               ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 10:19           ` Eli Zaretskii
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 11:58 Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-23 20:19 Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1020225115618.1432B-100000@is \
    --to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).