From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: configure tests for graphics libraries Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:13:31 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014617891 25768 195.204.10.66 (25 Feb 2002 06:18:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2002 06:18:11 GMT Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16fESg-0006hW-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 07:18:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16fEPt-0000je-00; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16fEP0-0000fZ-00; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA06021; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:13:31 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200202241758.g1OHw1n15025@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1503 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1503 On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > I just saw a suggestion that the existence of the function > EGifPutExtensionLast will distinguish the newer version of libungif > from the problematic one, but I can't currently check that. > > Can anyone else verify that? Verified; it's true. Version 4.1.0 doesn't have this function, while v4.1.0b1 does. So we now have a reliable way of detecting the buggy ungif library, we just need to ask the maintainers to never remove that function from the library ;-) Thanks, Dave. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel