From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two new entries in menu-bar's Tools menu Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:27:28 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013704928 14283 195.204.10.66 (14 Feb 2002 16:42:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2002 16:42:08 GMT Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16bOxT-0003iH-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:42:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bOm0-0000YW-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bOkj-0000Qq-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:28:58 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA02146; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:27:29 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Per Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1140 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1140 On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Per Abrahamsen wrote: > > Options (at least those in the menu bar's Options menu) are global, > > and when you "Save options", they get written to .emacs. > > Not any more, truncate-lines no longer gets saved. A few exceptions are merely a cionfirmation of the rule ;-) > I think it the "Tools -> Spell Checking" submenu would be the most > intuitive place for it, even if it isn't the most logical The Spell Checking menu is already too long, so I ruled against that. > > To me, Show/Hide is about minor display features. Speedbar is much more > > than a minor display feature, so I think classifying it as a tool is more > > correct. > > I don't see any requirement for being "minor". It's not a requirement, it's my personal interpretation. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel