From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing mode-line-inactive Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:45:25 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013410692 23202 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 06:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 06:58:12 GMT Cc: keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16aAPk-000628-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:58:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aAFy-00011a-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aAE9-00010e-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:46:13 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA22741; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:45:26 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200202110209.g1B29Nh06591@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:985 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:985 On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > Face changes do not happen often and they always go through certain > code. So any face change should clear caches, force redisplay, or > whatever it takes so that the change takes immediate effect. > > Is this not generally true now? I think it still is. I never tried to use copy-face in my customizations, so I don't know whether it should automatically clear the face caches. Perhaps it shouldn't. > If so, what other cases fail? I'm not sure what was reported is a failure. > Can someone figure out how to make it work? I don't know of any way except force the face caches to be cleared, e.g., with a call to clear-face-cache. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel