From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lost argument and doc string Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:48:57 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013407277 21074 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 06:01:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 06:01:17 GMT Cc: Pavel@Janik.cz, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16a9We-0005To-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:01:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16a9Mw-00066X-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16a9M4-000657-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA22077; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:48:57 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Tak Ota In-Reply-To: <20020210.152812.01367344.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:984 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:984 On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Tak Ota wrote: > > I have just fixed that in menu-bar.el where I defined toggling functions > > line-number-mode and column-number-mode. > > Thanks, it did fix the missing ARG problem. I wonder why Eli didn't > see the same one. Probably because I tried after "cvs up", which caught Pavel's latest changes that fixed the problem. > Is menu-bar.el specific to windoze? No, it's used by all versions. > BTW, 21.2.50 > is still suffering from the missing doc problem. Now the C-h f > line-number-mode looks like this. > > line-number-mode is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple'. > (line-number-mode ARG) > > Recently, to be conservative I've been building the new CVS source > from the scratch with "nmake bootstrap" every time. The latest build > looked like it did its job for building the DOC file. However, I > find no entry for line-number-mode in the actually created DOC file. > Does anyone have an idea? This _does_ seem Windows-specific, because I cannot reproduce it, and also because another user of the Windows version reported a similar problem with what looked like a perfectly valid DOC file. Is it possible that the change in the way doc strings are put in C files confuses the Windows port, either the make-docfile program or Emacs itself? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel