From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: csant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [multi-tty] Wrong type argument: framep, 0 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:28:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: References: <200705141835.l4EIZUYX010161@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: csant NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179260413 27421 80.91.229.12 (15 May 2007 20:20:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 22:20:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ho3VB-00074W-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 22:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho3d5-0008Lo-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HnraI-0007Cx-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 03:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HnraF-0007CS-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 03:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnraF-0007CO-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 03:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from csant.info ([69.36.171.12]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HnrSN-00045E-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 03:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (csant@localhost) by csant.info (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4F7SMG6026129; Tue, 15 May 2007 01:28:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <200705141835.l4EIZUYX010161@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:28:16 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71117 Archived-At: On Mon, 14 May 2007, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > There was an incorrect change installed on the multi-tty branch Thanks for the reply. Reverting that fix (as was done in CVS) indeed gets me back with a "running" emacs. However, I am saddened that my report was interpreted as somebody complaining not to have a multi-tty emacs to play with. The real reason was to help pinpointing issues - David Kastrup correctly identified a deeper issue (yes, that *is* broken in the current, running multi-tty) by fixing a first problem. But maybe it is too early to get feedback from non-developing users? Now to get back to something more constructive: where would be the correct forum to report multi-tty issues? I thought bug-gnu-emacs to be rather for released versions - multi-tty is something quite specific that I don't think many non-developping users adopt this early. /c