From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions regarding PGTK, high-dpi font-rendering, new X11-Warning Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:05:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <87edtncvss.fsf@thaodan.de> <87ilizwbkw.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cz94vjgl.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jugv9wi.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r0xkt06d.fsf@yahoo.com> <87zgc0n4m3.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21855"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: chad , Stefan Monnier , =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Bidar?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 14:05:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2Xe1-0005Ta-1o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:05:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2XdT-0001Wn-QW; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 08:05:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2XdQ-0001Uc-Br for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 08:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2XdO-0008CQ-44 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 08:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D6D1060318; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:05:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1670331914; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=5NrQ64U79SnMv1MYcox1xuojeNrXGhkP3rN7MPPTisE=; b=shq3kJ0nwYl3BDP2XoHz5SF/NLYFMhQQGXm4Oh1cYfM9Voh8Nx/ziWomwP6BSr4C kARISQR81IiiECi0qMVjHU7NCsFLxKExuJxFBRQwPn8Wen7FNhgj8hoEbP8lvMRXBWP 6xJzWwag/ZF8H2M94IVXFkLYA8pzFsoQqpOgiTZOsdWnMh8qIaKZctMiQFiqXnPvRgN MHnfRpQwXT7CK9ZRAACuWDwsgmhWY6x4rJOLS1l3iWnlUdnZGUnbgSXXKwNEozMTD4h Hmbnjf5cr5+J7lR29mo6xwCOOLGLmcETp7XBtRYX0+rc7LJfIsu0LWdhMssUKQi9nhr SE0TxhTdOg== In-Reply-To: <87zgc0n4m3.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300965 Archived-At: Dec 6, 2022, 11:39 by luangruo@yahoo.com: > chad writes: > >> I'm not up to doing the work myself, and obviously I'm not asking >> anyone else to do so, but I wonder if anyone has looked at moving >> emacs from Xlib to XCB? >> > > Emacs already uses XCB where available and necessary for performance > reasons. > > We will not "move" Emacs entirely to XCB, there is no point in that, and > the Qt folks are still dealing with the consequences of such a short > sighted decision even today. > Xlib uses XCB underneath anyway, what is this shortsightedness about?