From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions regarding PGTK, high-dpi font-rendering, new X11-Warning Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:51:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <87wn7gc53k.fsf@thaodan.de> <87r0xnx4fs.fsf@yahoo.com> <87edtncvss.fsf@thaodan.de> <87ilizwbkw.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cz94vjgl.fsf@yahoo.com-NI70zP3----9> <878rjsv9zj.fsf@yahoo.com> <87zgc8ttxp.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Bidar?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 16:52:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0PNw-0002Ev-UJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:52:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0PNH-0001eU-B5; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0PN4-0001cx-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:51:47 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0PN3-0000oB-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E33610602FA; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:51:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1669823495; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=V0w0bphkjl/6M4l1B47orCiqAVK4yHt2KaygjCDqvg8=; b=x6SIUzO7UPG2DPxYxMpezTSNTPpzeLxGy50C9XpnqVZJUlXQ0bqxy7/kcjbjuiuX i+BgoRafeP3xvt9QlnTHweti3VRQMIPaZBqfNLOAoXskBDA+nzUm40RjPKwp7bOmj04 XdRO7lbiYanLwJbzPP777kmxW1dA4YpdNt8MGXf9NgOETUB3FYTkzxYdzr3C5Pvjvfr wOxdSk7cRgh54M1cwcl0YtUxUulkMsGk3gV0HsRLpc3MRcd5D+DnNTucqY9ZHw+s0BY j1arfh9UimVntzrKJHnt9tc23E0hKhAqn7qAJcPivkJJilEEbCVAlhd96K3S6wyNBPx USq0ZtHqiA== In-Reply-To: <87zgc8ttxp.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300771 Archived-At: Nov 30, 2022, 14:09 by luangruo@yahoo.com: > xenodasein@tutanota.de writes: > >> This kind of belief in infallibility will make others less willing to >> want to work with you if they don't have to. >> > > [...] > >> Having a single binary thing, or having own renderer. >> > > [...] > >> I don't think it is worth for anyone to try to explain that as choices >> are made, and apparent from the way you are asking that there is no >> interest to reconsider anything. >> > > I see no point in taking this discussion any further, if you are only > capable of attacking the messenger, not the argument. > Okay, I won't continue.=C2=A0 I can't help myself from asking though: Which build target is it that have enough RAM to run Emacs but will require implementing an X color table exactly? My last suggestion is that before accusing anyone else of being wrong or attacking you, try to stop yourself before writing things like: "I've already explained why doing all graphics in Emacs will be a major step backwards. But let me reiterate:"