From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Naming FCRs Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:11:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <25033.3311.820141.174735@orion.rgrjr.com> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30814"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 14:12:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2CHX-0007pT-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:12:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2CHX-0007HE-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2CGM-0006b0-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:54292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2CGK-0007Fk-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B79C1060144 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:11:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640697091; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=hVM4MEcWYyYN5RaeYQ7flffJ9jFdUot3CKWk6htef4c=; b=a9r8jRaAjUbN8wM46jtezwz+rC4kVExlzXjN0hhJ7RYQrEkFHt8/lJwDNAi52JHx rtg/TwxkafE5ZPA2vRJb0p94WAwrf29tfae/DDa3/w6eD/kj6J+ZOfbLLawH+PuNEky MotyfJ6N/USqyaFbabvCNIanyGOjVXb7O8tbGFXZprLM7VHytDQJwXI2I7uGeKiWkfU uiYWbWv6U8m0vHqZbNfDBuCJEbbS3AASpXaOh515D8e15U7MUtXIikYnnx7UZRsiI1n 0ephVCPS03Kk3S2u6oatSM3+Spa+4I73iAPNWtA6DlaqFy1tHau1bDG4Sq5CvBD0qVP 2wT9lpuMXQ== In-Reply-To: <25033.3311.820141.174735@orion.rgrjr.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283506 Archived-At: Dec 27, 2021, 03:46 by Bob Rogers: > ... > Without looking at the code, this sounds more like a closure to me. > Since the slots are accessible outside the function, that would make it > a "transparent closure" . . . but I like the internal dissonance of > "open closure" better. ;-} > > -- Bob Rogers > > http://www.rgrjr.com/ > +1