From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On Contributing To Emacs Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:35:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <877dbpvsee.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23436"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: luangruo@yahoo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 13:37:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Bj6-0005sO-FW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:37:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Bj4-0003Hk-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 07:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2BhR-0002YF-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 07:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:46956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2BhQ-00019f-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 07:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22341060229; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 12:35:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640694926; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=WE+HYCl9/6v2iXLCSsPu5/ASNANMTCoTrkIPpbsVHWA=; b=bFyIQ5sjNsRdYeKyp1+6CsyUPvEJZCHHsLwIGr7P99gYuLMMHwV/lKEEJNPukM+t vRpWeyONwmFLnMKHlk/SQ7idnZ7CFjtkSeGVCOl1L1sDsNl23o2ZOH4adBS6MrnDnQc iMWpbtDL4Z6H6r6gcxk78TpUjJ2iHn9PDibZUdAhAOctXxTJV1T9ftSbt4V/ZJKzaFn Ts+D6pKsBREQopCzgBxhnPUwHm7M68N/FtYm3ieXUv6ksTZSfFlVdYBPFRrw67ao5HZ F29LfFUQP2N7mWdhv1u9u6gAlHs9U1IifbM+zqsqd25sllPgXImvhfSxx0yxrHKy7uG pKqSr6OkkQ== In-Reply-To: <877dbpvsee.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283499 Archived-At: Dec 28, 2021, 15:13 by Po Lu: > Why does a package manager need to constantly adapt to a changing > ecosystem, or be developed at a very high velocity? > ... > That doesn't make sense to me: package managers are one of the > cornerstones of an ecosystem, so I would expect that ecosystems tend to > adapt to their package managers, and not the other way around. > ... > That is simply untrue. > ... > I have actually seen (in person) various problems resulting from signing > legal documents via online forms destroy pieces of software, so I > strongly support the FSF's position on how the copyright assignment must > be signed. > ... > Why not ask? > ... > The point isn't author's complete non-falsifiable accuracy.=C2=A0 So thanks= for being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian, and proving their point, I gue= ss.