From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On Contributing To Emacs Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:26:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <83zgoopkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k6wsajh.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39542"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: philipk@posteo.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 21:27:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1Dd5-000A2z-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:26:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1Dd3-0000Yc-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 15:26:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1DcN-0007a9-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 15:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:39306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1DcJ-00042N-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 15:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FDD106015F; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:26:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640463969; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=O0GkZvsZCd5mXYVfLZ1JJdW7hFYgaZsHX5WKXCF9VfY=; b=2aI0SSXA6v1OYrxmM2Q4VEkdF4onjg4G95TzRwqN9fBqwe2w8iv+N8mZTyggMh0n a+I66bWa5UMGDZJAocGYcR8dOMb+xoVGmjWBCKW8N/aniDXAgs4sLZ2SVeZNrJPYWiQ OhPLmiNbZpjahZbFlZNxCuCmrk0ENCLBUikBZr/zBIrtx2SfKRO6eOLPLBIRRcRQY3h NAQpYr7asNZqYWoFwzuH6FwlujC+Cilt1CtwvHxi8xG3lQ9QpZQdKxpSzGhLh1LA6MW WI5HYrOLP9Dr6xTfpz1eED+pTs/NzF7NctYGGOrRxcAK7T3vslOAFh5OTE9M+x1yroy 1KQC4msDLA== In-Reply-To: <874k6wsajh.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283247 Archived-At: Dec 25, 2021, 23:18 by philipk@posteo.net: > xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." > writes: > >> Dec 25, 2021, 22:03 by eliz@gnu.org: >> >>> I don't think I understand what you are saying, but the changes >>> proposed there were installed 6 months later. >>> >> >> What I meant was that straight.el should have been a part of Emacs, >> in some form, as an improvement of package.el infrastructure. >> >> Instead, the actual change contributed was primarily a way to disable >> package.el. >> > > Do you mean that package.el should be extended by straight.el-like > functionality, or that straight.el (or a substitute) should be added to > Emacs? > > --=20 > Philip Kaludercic > The effort spent on it should have both improved existing package.el and also add straight.el like functionality to it.=C2=A0 Whether it is all = under feature 'package or multiple features.