From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On Contributing To Emacs Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:17:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <83zgoopkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <83y248pkhk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19927"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 20:19:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CZP-0004xh-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:19:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CZO-00041i-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CYG-0003KD-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:51382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1CYF-0003rp-5F; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E43106015E; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 19:17:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640459873; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=CDaiOJvr0/i4AKugWNhCmtaVQCaFbturDRov9hhPNZo=; b=JnAGKlTQmTwMVX2A6nPNKz6yKMJEqZT2PVqNB95jkaT5vyfYsm2a5LXUK+pO9rhX RiZNMY3kxZqZAwr6H+hZ9hsshikLE9XOfJstYHaefbUn9yaPo30cMv9eZLmICWLXfUY OV105IxuGGhNqXsT4kLDgS8XVmUx5/1dhnF7AMIikmYrqI8ZoiqtYrzhkQJ0UnoAPwm n5IWvOqSq2VcRCIxcDNIjZznT9kBock+0uWPj6zUoXhjQkTuB1DocZfnJJNmOwjkoZE Wvn7HxyNk/N0DubRUB2quAgYOG1Tjo4Ym+UYxG7BJOXAo+qKNV65taskYjCA7gBMPb3 U/a4t1enJw== In-Reply-To: <83y248pkhk.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283242 Archived-At: Dec 25, 2021, 22:12 by eliz@gnu.org: >> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:08:56 +0100 (CET) >> From: xenodasein@tutanota.de >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Instead, the actual change contributed was primarily a way to disable >> package.el. >> > > ??? The change we are talking about was to introduce the early-init > file, which AFAIU makes the lives of package.el users easier. > It also makes display related configurations easier.=C2=A0 This is only my = observation as to why author of straight.el contributed this patch.=C2=A0 If I am wrong= , they would need to have a very good reason for not contributing it directly as an improvement to Emacs.=C2=A0 My argument is that that reason couldn't hav= e been "hardness of changing Emacs."