From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Platform independent graphical display for Emacs Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:45:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <87sfujh4a2.fsf@yahoo.com> <877dbuhm6j.fsf@yahoo.com> <87tueyg5gc.fsf@yahoo.com> <87lf0a2uq0.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmpmrzm3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37980"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, dgutov@yandex.ru, rudalics@gmx.at, paaguti@gmail.com, andpuke@foxmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 13:48:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n16T0-0009jG-CC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:48:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n16Sx-00048B-3v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 07:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n16QI-00030G-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 07:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:44518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n16QG-0002i2-Nx; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 07:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30B410602E4; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:45:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640436314; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=JSjONmtjmlSjSkG73ymli3ItM94LPTcsMT1LMkSNcfE=; b=K8mokWbw5q9SJc3y+yKxDWfeiwJf+Ixu6NVfsStWlWYmPrgLRNz0Q+aAICySk+iX /fuI5PlAqFnjludhyY3xJmISb+fPqzMNR6QvXt9AVjrN7guAwATAEvWZNve3lcU8sOJ 9FfFQqXOqiJ9En1irpqdivXkGJ2U1tHGprZN2SGysLAxLgYswaST3190rqExeKxEC3U YCwRHK541xEUSQ1CYFPcKQN4ZeryiYumifGDkvTFpjl81tqarxX/DSieAkepZOZTU0y Z2C9agGeOggBpjX6YluRzs58iEsg147Ei0QugVwRPJOWBYVgQIOAkLjb+R29/hqaUVp IPObxZRfzw== In-Reply-To: <83pmpmrzm3.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283206 Archived-At: FWIW, a lot of conversation seem to happen in this line of thread that have wrong judgment on what is being suggested.=C2=A0 It may not be complete or perfectly clear, but already contradicts some of things written after it. Please see: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-12/msg02539.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-12/msg02574.html