From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:55:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <83mtkuypr6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: xenodasein@tutanota.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="563"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 22 01:56:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzpvl-000AYf-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:56:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60266 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzpvk-0002NJ-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzpvD-0001dW-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:50704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzpvC-0001GX-6b; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113C7FA0E10; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:55:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1640134556; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=CvjKZSlRpJCXxPOewK8v2XqVRoE92CgU7/kw+pMKHWI=; b=Q5pH9Z1k4+SLQ/myFe1+KFvxYjMBnxxGIBlMt5sYjAiRWn/wL2Y/Nx47gvVTU2tv BiAm8lhX3dA7WYjoqXo8pKLWHrTkL4ExgqEfUppgSZoZsv3i0LBjlv9XhRM9w7pyTPA /UlEiLBF8sMoHZAapN3DXQn8kvLA0bSa+jRxRrFcFfo33mz0JwP5eJAEUsejhCQX3Na njTuHDolANpZ0gp5Z8qqRZElgvEgxySgyRm+tzWInHxfOmNznuf/+C9CPm72Qq6Htp9 WlQV7veOJORDNk6udeaEZy96utUaxJ62eiaLCFEwY2h4bVQHx7BkP62ZT+b3dtinleI Lt6Q19aFXA== In-Reply-To: <83mtkuypr6.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=xenodasein@tutanota.de; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282661 Archived-At: Quoting: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-12/msg02015.ht= ml From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:52:13 +0200 > Our Git repository is public, so everyone can study its statistics. > Do you have any evidence that the rate of changes and contributions in > Emacs deteriorates with the years? I did not necessarily want to imply that it was an existing problem, just a what-if.=C2=A0 I do not have it but I suppose some numbers could be produced using amounts of active contributors, contributions, total LOC, etc. and ratios as evidence?=C2=A0 There are also software that analyze cod= e complexity using metrics such as cyclomatic complexity I believe. My reason own to bring it up was that I absolutely hated what I saw here: GOOGLE ALERT https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=3Dall&q=3D= %2Fm%2F01yp0m,%2Fm%2F07zh7,%2Fm%2F0134xwrk