From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:12:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <97DB3D40-872D-4958-83CE-2FB3AB171E7C@zjp.codes> <87v9lmx508.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ftcpgp5k.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39780"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Zach Pearson , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 27 13:15:06 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jT1j6-000AEX-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:15:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT1j5-0005v1-Tw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT1go-0001l2-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT1gn-000547-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.135]:26736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT1gm-0004wh-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:12:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1587985957; bh=dX6paVQfF887vTNIcGM01yf0YaiVRldwlCyeMWyXUZQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EWvHJguEb671i95L1ZOPXzO1LEbLDyAmRrpbvnmFg7budqZu19sGymeiPREgzYYFt NeHTL8xoIS5xvmacFGEJ4A4h0D/1MTNgEdknrYp1wWSCJMqBRmpZg/VbvWSgwoZu8o OFL6UpN11C/RS9z4KDCvBG+nuhfQd900M9389tz8= In-Reply-To: <87ftcpgp5k.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.135; envelope-from=ndame@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40135.protonmail.ch X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/27 05:45:46 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247910 Archived-At: > > The advantage is that you do not break every package in existence that > has numbered mouse clicks like that, and that you do not break existing > people's experience. You don't have to break anything. 'mouse-left' could be used instead of 'mo= use-1' while also keeping 'mouse-1' as an alias for it for backward compatibility.