From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:20:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> <83k12ed20s.fsf@gnu.org> <9GxTqx0raB6NkyAQ4gjUHfoCFK4rgmvRKZaUUxM-p6WOuO_3oJOBYiXI4L8pGz-VtHtgYKJ14Z1nU9UmZ68nJLO18nLYnaBaqBxLEaNN9mg=@protonmail.com> <83d086cu05.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106195"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 18 18:27:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jPqJd-000RUd-6F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:27:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPqJc-0008Fw-7k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPqDP-0006n9-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPqDM-0002gy-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:63372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPqDM-0002U0-8V; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:21:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1587226864; bh=7ulToS9ycsz7FaiRcOv3TAkqJpK6zJhcX3ojhO9hfOs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HPKBQ5hBccmei5mZH6wqE1SzeIQthbSmC3eA1+UfrK/x8iOOI83KDGDV1ib+q3cfu IzLg3d1jJfCcWJ+GP9pGTIg+Yh4NTW3UrxGePv1fnLH9z33SY9zMXDg/MIVKRHYZY4 olqEdBX+GfHhxOq8rl6HHNT7eU3JVZD6TiM/rZ3k= In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247230 Archived-At: > > I think wikimedia is outdated. The Gnome icons at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Desktop_icons are apparently for an earlier, obsolete version. I downloaded the indicated version (gnome-icon-theme 2.20.0) and the files in it were last changed in = 2007, but the icons still look nice. Emacs could benefit from using these icons too, even if they are obsolete, because they are consistent and look good.