> On Feb 17, 2024, at 8:55 PM, Po Lu wrote: > >> In fact IDLWAVE does still work and is useful for a small set of >> users, it just does more harm than good in core, IMO. > > Packages whose existence comes at the detriment of their host (Emacs) do > not develop this trait over time. This strikes me as a very rigid perspective. In my view, the costs and benefits of any capability of a system can ebb and flow over time, as the context in which they are evaluated changes.