From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git archive no longer being updated? Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:43:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86ws015tpr.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262879336 2529 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 15:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:48:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSuaf-0003PK-Cd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:48:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuaf-0002M1-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuWw-0006J8-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuWs-0006CH-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57114 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuWr-0006C8-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:38947) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSuWr-0004YD-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so18292215gxk.6 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:44:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Y0NgSHKm62YwMEjjCuVYsp6CkIEdOwJzm6AmlKv34PU=; b=kgNXr4IondVFoUwu9blW1y2lb3BV/ae49AFBCMW+bfvZNswqJvMSAAM3fZ6c23EtaJ RHT8GjC5NYITc2agLgFH2Gj2MePKObemLTKhJbVpOCL4cpC3hgpY8fhTjcMJgn5vBJN1 UX/6WBt16ZtXvDJCv+iPDboddYqRXRC/HQEoM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=gzz9RvBI4Gv0viRIvNBQFij4AoeJm34fnH20S+pQpS8cTMUDtzT95mPWf0L0MVZxBI zxztCXvSj4rRY6quPyVZyp6qBmzQKtF+B+xPu/CxiLnw1d2c+pLQuksjoh6FYLrHNe/m 7gGBCKU6O5JhcGx6Rr6heHsap0wkvOXARZAFI= Original-Received: by 10.150.127.23 with SMTP id z23mr32493150ybc.179.1262879043356; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:44:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.42? (pool-96-236-181-152.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [96.236.181.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm8780908yxg.14.2010.01.07.07.43.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:44:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119590 Archived-At: On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > You can follow the mirror at repo.or.cz, but it is only updated > manually. I've been trying it out and I'm having some issues with this wrt. my = downstream branches, which have been based on the official mirror on = Savannah until Dec 27. Now, I can merge yours and the old SV mirror using the 'ours' strategy. = This works in that is creates a common ancestor with the downstream = branches, so I can merge the resulting branch downstream. However, it is kind of ugly since git-log then shows commits from both = the Savannah and the .Cz branch, even though the commits were = functionally equivalent. It's logical, but it keeps 100k redundant = commits around. Would it not be possible to rebase the new changes on top of the old = branches, or directly do the fast-import with the previous repository = from Savannah? Or are there disadvantages to the old conversion? (I haven't figured out how to use rebase without common ancestors, so I = haven't tried it out.)