From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On elisp running native - Update 12 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:20:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83o8uegykm.fsf@gnu.org> <74dd94a9-28cb-a5fd-dbc7-ab21009834ad@cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org, "Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions." To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 28 17:22:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuzI-0009Hs-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:22:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39222 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuzH-000268-NS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuwn-0000Lf-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]:39806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuwg-0004Ze-TL; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id d1so1013894qtr.6; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:20:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4tAdZxZiUK6/e9SBBXBdZSJJ0942In3d+J3KcEYkoxQ=; b=um10xS5Iv8k6MhmF1s6nZ10HDbTLGprVGycaiQZeTJQyzBbbuDAchZjqwXsY3Tq1Vv dDSkDIbSDdCf+E/jSRt2J7sbb2tbV80Dc9BoK5xrxdq3Z5dVr5RR6kh08iINCSFLFlRF nDDkqv4/8BJ3v9MTnETzN3gV+vmkSy2X3TqP+mfRKGInOdkIOOPfIhitZyyj+asGQdjb R/VSDQzxaPt1WNSSWI6tMwTHiCB7IvzsJi8YAgj2sRWEp4WPfFabt3quVY/9+fpVt72j K+HP+KFEbSWlSUKIihiCX1oOeS5i5pYTgjMp9BpLJ2BgIQGf1utPNLxq3VI1Ez2eLNcu px9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4tAdZxZiUK6/e9SBBXBdZSJJ0942In3d+J3KcEYkoxQ=; b=MFAgVj3kMafKFIKNTFGV5iz1qvlXmJRvNOagVmMZNyaCxdjVTwPe0QWmdjOf+qICyI xI6pwWlt5XTc4ID1NPaJ41vzQu+yY6maLtxmo2B6dMeQF/AOb0pd9/GWP0+/AOWJPGBh cFX9EdgVx9+dRd0FbOwVmQ3rX1i2DsKLSf8p3kwFq/nQuAUSrF+gonZKjOb8YRVwqPy2 pgtfzcTXelVX+IpGgAGOKeqrNpi0p+ULFKkT6hV83FDbTUxuVNBBnA1NVwz+fFgLimYa xjNRjh1wA+pi9Dv4V1g5JEiUfwcDQvNmQwQssPQrmvhavx9U/ogpM9BOl/xQ/0YTJWOv v6XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vS3PnwHS/nijaF9HsiOmbcbwUsJVK6Jlju+EAwDe/cCK19jrq st+HJBeKiOXuRqQaMOT/C24= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyARmIM5q1+hzx2hk04mIOgk2SpIwPVl8NroUMouIASFoaqbfb8ziKOOWul67QTQN73+Cb9Qg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4d01:: with SMTP id w1mr2151062qtv.357.1601306404877; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:98a:4200:9210:1d4f:3308:29b5:c46e? ([2601:98a:4200:9210:1d4f:3308:29b5:c46e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 201sm1256583qkf.103.2020.09.28.08.20.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:20:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::829; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256602 Archived-At: > On Sep 28, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Andrea Corallo wrote: >=20 > Yuan Fu writes: >=20 >> Hi Andrea, >>=20 >> Update 12 looks very cool. Is it possible now to eliminate funcall to >> all built-in functions (instead of only primitives)? Do you think = that >> it will give significant speed-up? >=20 > Hi Yuan, >=20 > in my nomenclature primitive functions are already all C functions. I > always thought that's way to call them [1]. But coming to your = question > we already remove funcall calling all C functions so... no more > improvements there ;) >=20 > Andrea >=20 > [1] = Thanks for clarifying. I got the false impression that normal compiled = Elisp functions can also be called without funcall when watching your = talk, or I just remembered wrong. :-) Yuan=