From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Matching regex case-sensitively in C strings? Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <218795BA-107D-4A86-9ACF-0A44BD2EC3D2@gmail.com> <83edufyoad.fsf@gnu.org> <580E87E6-DCFD-42AE-807A-339BBB3878C2@acm.org> <5711A9D3-7BCB-44AE-8911-5E039FF5FBB8@gmail.com> <838rklxmnm.fsf@gnu.org> <4FB7E922-5E36-4E0C-9681-9EC0E719CC8D@acm.org> <834jv8uvjj.fsf@gnu.org> <481B14DE-D209-4B5B-A517-0F721E7C5854@acm.org> <83wn83qcpr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 15:21:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ot8QW-0006Pi-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:21:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot8Pl-0005KD-GL; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot8Pj-0005K5-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:20:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail33c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ot8Pg-0002UF-2p; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:20:18 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1668090007; bh=UAcS0pisADVzOp4n0xGsPm1GigGcRzMhhlPViVjfgqY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=M1yvjKw0SjUl27uvon0w76fagZAfBuOyVCCcG69T99h9BBOoYY/SL6jFAJsaQ8djr NAuMkwXdMteacNFyz3u85efxY9ivvbHjkdlS/TAJtvC7ibVBLhnxOSyaT41MjKGKq6 rwjyFz24PWLuuUQenafuJUG/bTaEAg78CAe4q7Eo= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150-171-209.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.171.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail33c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 2AAEK5DE094238; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:20:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83wn83qcpr.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F25.636D0897.003E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.10.43; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail33c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299489 Archived-At: 10 nov. 2022 kl. 12.18 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > Why not have two separate functions for these two jobs? The code is > short, and some duplication is not an issue in this case. Sure. Yuan Fu presented an alternative which used inline functions and I = don't mind that approach either.