From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ea93326: Add `union' and `intersection' to rx (bug#37849) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:08:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20191210213842.5388.30110@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191210213843.EB6A520A23@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <67645170-D29F-4C77-99F4-09706856CEEB@acm.org> <719A6AF3-9624-422A-B6E6-FC942623B5C5@acm.org> <8D6E2D8D-4617-4EFA-9E60-F5C7B443C24C@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="99682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 15 12:41:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1igSGn-000Pq5-4P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:41:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37970 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1igSGl-0003OZ-Bk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1igSG2-0002sn-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:40:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igSG1-0005T5-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1469c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.69]:38148 helo=mail102c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igSG0-0005Ea-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:40:17 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1576408110; bh=6aB7HtzASZABbVjS9BtXqdt8z+Zob7C/DOAdtqQnYGE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=MZotkHFn4gOlfkV8sFLBCw1tWy2an1t5wLB1vJaNaOGn2oC5adq0TI5vqppxvIwtL P8zwsQTMi66cSQJRSkxdKjxMB+hwLuyz1pLhLpABfnpAHmnHwMepky7R+mfbzLJ4ui X193Qkahtv1spSOHkoerXqzpHQ0dx5wrt5mwHoZ4= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from stanniol.lan (c-6f4fe655.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [85.230.79.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail102c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id xBFB8R5B013796; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 11:08:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0210.5DF6142E.0028, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=Q8qsHL+a c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:117 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=iRZporoAAAAA:8 a=rl6nE9zBPl_DFn1Lfg8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=NOBgFS-JBQ2l-kSd6-zu:22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.136.14.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243395 Archived-At: 14 dec. 2019 kl. 00.03 skrev Stefan Monnier : >> Something like (longest-or STRING...) has been proposed, but was not well >> received. A solution is still sought (preferably one that doesn't involve >> rewriting the regexp engine). > > There's posix-string-match and friends, A bit overkill just for matching a set of constant strings, don't you think?