From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; TRAMP does not pass regime Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:12:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877ig42tqt.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205576009 25115 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2008 10:13:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 15 11:13:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaTOm-0001eu-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:13:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaTOC-0003JW-7W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaTO5-0003I4-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaTO3-0003Fo-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaTO2-0003F9-Il for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaTO2-00021K-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JaTO2-0003Bd-3J for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaTNy-00020G-NS for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaTNy-0001yS-Dd for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.4.92.17] (helo=7.mx.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JaTNv-0008G7-2A; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:13:03 +0100 Original-Received: from fcd2f.f.ppp-pool.de ([195.4.205.47]:57674 helo=[192.168.1.2]) by 7.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID peter_dyballa@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #12) id 1JaTNu-0002zt-Ny; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:13:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877ig42tqt.fsf@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92663 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21593 Archived-At: Am 15.03.2008 um 10:59 schrieb Michael Albinus: > That is a feature. See (info "(tramp)Filename completion") > > "This works pretty much like for files on the local host, with the > exception that minibuffer killing via a double-slash works only on =20= > the > filename part, except that filename part starts with `//'. A > triple-slash stands for the default behaviour." I don't understand: what is the "default behaviour?" That // starts a =20= new path name? Does this paragraph tell me to use /// to start a new =20 path? > The idea behind is, that it is more likely to open another file on the > remote host, than to open a file from somwhere else. In which case is // part of remote path name? And on what system? DOS =20= with its C://...? -- Mit friedvollen Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen Pete =C2=BB=C2=BF=CA=87=C4=B1=CC=A3 =C9=99snq=C9=90 =CA=87,u=C9=90=C9=94 no=CA=8E= =C9=9F=C4=B1=CC=A3 =C9=93u=C4=B1=CC=A3=C9=A5=CA=87=CA=8Eu=C9=90 s=C4=B1=CC=A3 poo=C9=93 = =CA=87=C9=90=C9=A5=CA=8D=C2=AB