From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bozhidar Batsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: call for more ert tests Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:03:42 +0300 Message-ID: References: <8541.1372238544@theowa.merten-home.homelinux.org> <840F973045B745D5A6674ADC9C142B62@gmail.com> <83mwqchnso.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="51cb10de_763b8c4e_b3" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372262643 27528 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2013 16:04:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: smerten@oekonux.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 26 18:04:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrsCJ-0007Ri-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:03:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrsCJ-0006Ts-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:03:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrsCC-0006Th-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrsC4-0005gh-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ea0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22d]:60961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrsBy-0005fy-R3; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id g15so7691835eak.18 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=4Q4alzDnZYhU4JlhUjE3uRKLHRiD+Kr0AbdsIbMwiZ8=; b=Mpy31X3wDRiQbfIxIPthHx4ZrOX4FqpNbT45fK5oUsTz5uKsUuO6Hdjmi9o/l0s0Np QGhCYzLS6bhGSzYnY4UDE0rTAJH8GFxD0FupAGD34G398c5aYNSg6DGzRT5pjiOITFkm gtouxF5MVmz3pj/N/Zr22grpresKEfFQp1K8YnRV6hbyiUfDRUz0W44SNU8pA5n43Kfa Tp0r0sohHybVyq1kbrBarKH7BAa6eJqtCKV9rTkIupy2s/mpbsoLbzh/cKMJYVEaM3xh HTcEysdcwAlTrRAunvEmPGVhl1Kd2KAmTQRpU9bXWWN8pGT0fU8+8JLSkd1x3QWuQf6Z 4OEg== X-Received: by 10.14.223.199 with SMTP id v47mr4889703eep.32.1372262613796; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.28] ([95.87.231.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n45sm43525862eew.1.2013.06.26.09.03.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:03:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mwqchnso.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c01::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161101 Archived-At: --51cb10de_763b8c4e_b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:17:57 +0300 > > From: Bozhidar Batsov > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org (mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org) > > > > Here's my two cents - having tests is good as long as there is someone to constantly run them. I think it'd be great of Emacs started running tests automatically after each commit with the help of some integration server (like Travis, Jenkins or something similar). It'd be easier to spot problems that way and people would be aided in developing some good programming habits. > > You cannot run tests that aren't there, can you? Indeed you cannot. > > > On a related note at some point we might want to start using an issue tracker alongside the mailing list. > > We already have an issue tracker, see http://debbugs.gnu.org/. I'm aware of its existence, but it's kind of spartan and not particularly easy to navigate/search/etc. It looks to me like a web interface to a bug mailing list (which I guess it is). I was thinking of something more like bugzilla, trac, etc. --51cb10de_763b8c4e_b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
On W= ednesday, June 26, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:17:57 +0300
=46rom: Bozhidar Batso= v <bozhidar=40batsov.com<= /a>>

Here's my two cents - having= tests is good as long as there is someone to constantly run them. I thin= k it'd be great of Emacs started running tests automatically after each c= ommit with the help of some integration server (like Travis, Jenkins or s= omething similar). It'd be easier to spot problems that way and people wo= uld be aided in developing some good programming habits.

You cannot run tests that aren't there, can= you=3F
Indeed you cannot. 

On a related note at some point we might want to start using a= n issue tracker alongside the mailing list.

We already have an issue tracker, see http://debbugs.gnu.org/.
=20 =20 =20 =20
=20
I'm aware of its exis= tence, but it's kind of spartan and not particularly easy to navigate/sea= rch/etc. It looks to me like a web interface to a bug mailing list (which= I guess it is). I was thinking of something more like bugzilla, trac, et= c.
--51cb10de_763b8c4e_b3--