From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/' Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:16:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87abx6u905.fsf@truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176995850 26300 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2007 15:17:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 17:17:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeYNv-0005Ij-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:17:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeYSs-0000xW-8t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeYSo-0000vA-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HeYSm-0000uK-TV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeYSm-0000uB-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HeYNo-0002c8-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw3.us.oracle.com (rgmgw3.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.112]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id l3JFHDNQ000521 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:17:13 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by rgmgw3.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l3J5sX1A005419 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:17:06 -0600 Original-Received: from dhcp-4op11-4op12-west-130-35-178-179.us.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2629438411176995766; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:16:06 -0700 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <87abx6u905.fsf@truman.edu> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69637 Archived-At: I really have not followed this thread, but, viewed from 3000 m, it sounds as if different people have different preferences. Couldn't Emacs just offer a few precedence options, so users could choose the behavior they want? (Then, of course, you could argue over the default value ;-).)