From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Glitches in set-frame-position for E16 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <51F8EF7D.8030309@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375282502 3759 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2013 14:55:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 31 16:55:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4Xnq-0005J9-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:55:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51888 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4Xnp-0000vK-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:55:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4Xnh-0000ur-47 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:54:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4Xna-0004nY-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.bdtv.se ([176.10.222.34]:52651) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4Xna-0004mD-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3396 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2013 14:54:41 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-57.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.57) by mail01.bdtv.se with ESMTPA; 31 Jul 2013 14:54:41 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (unknown [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F7591A1D78; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:54:41 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <51F8EF7D.8030309@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 176.10.222.34 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162296 Archived-At: Hello. 31 jul 2013 kl. 13:05 skrev Dmitry Antipov : > Can someone check whether set-frame-position really works > with her/his favorite WM/DE? With my E16, the call to >=20 > (set-frame-position (selected-frame) 100 100) >=20 > moves the selected frame to (200, 200), and call to >=20 > (set-frame-position (selected-frame) -100 -100) >=20 > moves it to somewhere which is definitely not the > place I expect on my 1366x768 screen (1266, 668). Any window manager may intercept the frame position and modify it. This = is most possibly E16 adjusting the position, possibly to not cover up = some panel or something. Jan D.