From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 68ae6fa: Improved light/dark colour predicate (bug#41544) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200610181238.9796.44750@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200610181239.947C4204DF@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <93F81C41-E774-4C02-9E9D-5B2CD1F66445@acm.org> <86v9jwksod.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5A6B8DE2-EADF-4D74-A0EA-DE5303F828D4@acm.org> <0F5723EE-113E-4D3B-9BD8-D5327B3E87A1@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="43910"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Yuri Khan , tomas@tuxteam.de, Stephen Leake , emacs-devel To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 21 09:52:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmum9-000BL5-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41096 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmum8-0000L6-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 03:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmulV-0008Jc-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 03:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1440c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.40]:49812 helo=mail264c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmulT-0004lI-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 03:51:44 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1592725900; bh=NpmepgbUlUZzTEQrIKKygNlNekJ6zARec5MCoys3+EM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=G+JhiwrAuz6wlW2kTzKJJUrqxQ1fmYlLg0/4Hzd9aM/JKjYhV8a9xHPCkwyvp1++C OMmRXNnM2OMvESQeIeWN/mxQ1Ic7Cv3vcddmfWK8Ch8IOJA8KOg6UY6xTTppJ+lSu8 LxOowhhHiqPMCiRa8wS+Y6Ul/jzwYTBg/bzC9m/w= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.comhem.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail264c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 05L7pbRb017286; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:51:39 +0000 X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F19.5EEF118C.004B, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=PPNxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=yPCof4ZbAAAA:8 a=qqpj90cVz5AlglWUQuoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.40; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail264c50.megamailservers.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/21 03:51:41 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252483 Archived-At: 18 juni 2020 kl. 22.32 skrev Drew Adams : > A defvar would be fine. defconst explicitly signals > the intention that neither users nor code should > change the value. That's the wrong signal, I think. We'll have to disagree then -- the amount isn't changed programmatically = and not intended to be changed by the user any more than any numeric = literal inside a function. Again, this can be changed if it turns out to = be useful.