From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Qiantan Hong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Representation of the Emacs userbase on emacs-devel Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:58:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <83bl5dsh8b.fsf@gnu.org> <8335qps8vs.fsf@gnu.org> <9471c28f-8eae-b555-ee86-9fffd6229937@yandex.ru> <87r1e690n8.fsf_-_@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="879"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "danflscr@gmail.com" , "rms@gnu.org" , Emacs Devel , Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , John Yates To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 01:01:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLviC-00007q-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 01:01:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLviA-0006ea-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 19:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLvgl-0005r3-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 19:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu ([18.9.28.13]:60897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLvgj-0005Da-NB; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 19:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 182Mxipf014923; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from oc11expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.47) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:58:52 -0400 Original-Received: from oc11expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.47) by oc11expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from oc11expo16.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.4.47]) by oc11expo16.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.4.47]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:58:29 -0400 Thread-Topic: Representation of the Emacs userbase on emacs-devel Thread-Index: AQHXoDoQW3YZbclglUq4yQHPq3AdvquRnusA In-Reply-To: <87r1e690n8.fsf_-_@posteo.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [128.12.122.49] Content-ID: <01D1FDF4A4ECE842B1748B664AAC5D2E@exchange.mit.edu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=18.9.28.13; envelope-from=qhong@mit.edu; helo=outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273734 Archived-At: > Under the current system a sufficiently loud single user can > effectively veto any change. Or at least 3-4 such users. >=20 > But even 5 or 10 users are in no way representative of our entire user ba= se. Let reason speak, not individual.=