From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs.app dev]: ghost cursor problem is still there Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5f089c510807191428n349bdf55gebdff2e0ca668db7@mail.gmail.com> <7C93A2A7-54FD-43A9-BA1B-0B8502FFA5C6@gmail.com> <1AFEFF71-2AEA-4282-915E-B03050E98592@gmail.com> <8ED46157-6210-4767-A5AE-0DDE4C9DB1B3@gmail.com> <90AB958C-083A-4DA6-86B6-C63DB82776CE@gmail.com> <200808231730.m7NHUdUv018072@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808232113.m7NLDf9Z028460@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219530841 16927 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2008 22:34:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 24 00:34:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KX1h7-000307-TV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:34:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX1gA-0005Jt-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX1g5-0005Jo-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KX1g2-0005Jc-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55174 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KX1g2-0005JZ-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:1624) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KX1g2-0004GY-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so477193uge.17 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:33:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=WjD0Q/f1NU+RKnDeBIEByaDxc893rHNVTGOY7nJqphg=; b=dcy6QI5i45lo7YeEPnTUaPCUru6iqsqLR7dhRZTBaqcrx5Q+aV1tbJh7IfU/fD4/yd 1+GJdztFrZ+EbhczWZk6CURqUCgwq53HWEJ7QCdMlH20Ju3zSjnAC6/MXq1LtqYGk917 010VFD8IyNuJNIf5nBYs0gDV7VmrbaW8Ccb/Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=HnSusibc0CiqMFF3UTESvG7/yjdN9o4i1VgzqEyKFbOENrEiu94LU3atLQEFJZU+/O mfBptv/qLd1L5O85lOZOIdKPaEgH9kqOZH/t/GSGOrOT8pWeed3sIoRCVvoiwmIpuJW3 BvX4wTwbfJz4UtEF65TrSlBw6EntjQnhgKPCI= Original-Received: by 10.67.40.15 with SMTP id s15mr883032ugj.67.1219530825502; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.0.1.5? ( [68.162.152.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm7206995ugf.9.2008.08.23.15.33.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:33:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200808232113.m7NLDf9Z028460@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102899 Archived-At: On 23 Aug 2008, at 17:13, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > AFAIK they should be identical, except for formatting, no need to > indent > the CVS logs with a TAB. Right, and the CVS comment for the ChangeLog is then supposed to contain a third copy of the same info - is that correct?