From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Let's shut down bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:57:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134457123 17565 80.91.229.2 (13 Dec 2005 06:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Richard M. Stallman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 07:58:41 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em477-0003Ei-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:58:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em47e-0004nL-ID for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:58:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Em473-0004lP-Qb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Em472-0004l0-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em472-0004kx-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.127.198.35] (helo=rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Em48r-00079I-MG; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from raeburn.org (c-65-96-168-237.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[65.96.168.237]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005121306573501300c5o46e>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:57:36 +0000 Original-Received: from [18.101.0.226] (laptop.raeburn.org [18.101.0.226]) by raeburn.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBD6vYxG016034; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:57:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: Original-To: Alan Mackenzie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47612 Archived-At: On Dec 12, 2005, at 04:10, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > The sort of process I envisage would work something like this: > (i) Mail arriving at the list goes through the (presumably already > installed) automatic filter (Spamassassin?). > (ii) Of what's left, anything from a known serious poster passes > through. > (iii) Anything which is a response to an existing article passes > through. > (iv) The rest stays in limbo for up to 24 hours; during that time, a > moderator may accept it or reject it; > (v) After 24 hours (moderator on holiday?) articles will get passed > through to the list. Is it common these days to forge approval lines in moderated groups? Perhaps spam articles should be actively cancelled on the nntp side, or posted to the nocem group, or whatever it is that's usually done these days, in addition to simply not letting them through the mail filter.... Ken