From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: packages submissions : ob-sql-session and org-blog Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:09:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zfoe64bl.fsf@posteo.net> <28da95b9-131a-4fbf-bedc-56219082233d@7d.nz> <871q1gdqzr.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pe@7d.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 22 06:10:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ssDvR-00060w-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 06:10:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssDv6-0007RE-G4; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssDv3-0007Qv-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssDv3-0004mR-6G; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:09:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=blRkiLP3gC7Xujs5SiZ52j7szzagctkiqpHTeXcqEew=; b=EeIrGEWBUkTI pRJDgATAcl/HIwRsV/DUZNvHeCBkkorlYq2kaVkAz1EEUxSI0b/DogEguOTz6W8hTJrw71Q+7hXqr B9SRdC/B1ad/VvkPUzbPnAQnh+lZnRxItJD7YAkxFAwGLHG1xXnsoA8zruUd7pbnX44psiD9v9pHK VSKM6PC+toD1bciQhqcAwtgK6jUNwnrdJ9iacIzUMixCuUmYxmBxAxLo4ri86AzSsRZHJd6zC3ozI JuVK8bqDV5OD3qrzP+my0xR78vcZShYWnLB+1/MCBB6Na2dxJZk5P9n1oAqr5nJAOND/3uBtlGiuV ACj+pL1BuYvVfOgaASUSRA==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssDv2-00025M-N1; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 00:09:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871q1gdqzr.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:47:36 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323909 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > >> historically we have accepted both "is part of GNU Emacs" and "is NOT > >> part of GNU Emacs". IMO the better choice is to say neither. We can change this aspect of the license notice to fit the ways we distribute that file. If a file is part of Emacs, it should say so, and we should write the notice as we do fo all the other files of Emacs. If the file is NOT part of Emacs, meaning if it is distributed in other ways separately from Emacs, them we could use the sort of license notice that says "This program" and does not mention "GNU Emacs". -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)