From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cond* Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87frzuae9n.fsf@posteo.net> <871qbatqc8.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmsz7lzn.fsf@posteo.net> <87edf1m7lq.fsf@localhost> <87cyui76l9.fsf@localhost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21578"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 05:24:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLblP-0005Lo-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 05:24:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkL-0002HQ-Lt; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkK-0002Gy-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkK-0005kS-7I; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=zO4vR4V3/l7a33Jz20miS6uuHL1e9dlGDJ2g1YrFZRQ=; b=RNeEkW3XLsKQ NjcCaEqw6AQ2LNNSRZzIencsCaEkysc0KIvWsJVoH5dI19JH7Uwq1slIynz5W/qhNPMxY2jeQLyfd RgKYOHk2bViwApA1v4yjpRM6uZQvlzsaPU3gkxYtxm901KiKwbg4UamPhFI+/olH7+sylDrPYNPxh NcUA7h31p//M/Cni/2QTXBOUmgvZSmMoCRruYniJaTIZvRdxKPaSSBX+HYfUXSqMvNNV8lhjSbz3d F0Lfc5XZ7Azngp02x/IqJ2vkpK7FRrpPZhS0hYSw0MyScEYD3n1ZXKh9uotByF8c+7fjsKUalTV7U AsyH4Yg1XG6jO9DwgaBOCg==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLbkJ-0000EX-Sj; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87cyui76l9.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Wed, 03 Jan 2024 15:57:22 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314555 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I was referring to what "pred" in `pcase' does: > ‘(pred FUNCTION)’ > Matches if the predicate FUNCTION returns non-‘nil’ when called on > EXPVAL. The test can be negated with the syntax ‘(pred (not > FUNCTION))’. The predicate FUNCTION can have one of the following > forms: Ok. Given that for comparison, what conclusion or suggestion to you offer about cond*? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)