From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should Emacs define site-lisp load-path for Dynamically-Loaded Modules? Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:36:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87msx9c57e.fsf@thaodan.de> <87h6ngd8or.fsf@thaodan.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17810"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?To=3A_Bj=C3=83=C2=B6rn_Bidar_=3Cbjorn=2Ebidar=40thaodan=2Ede=3E?= =?UTF-8?Q?=0A?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 14:37:54 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qmCkj-0004Uo-Tl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:37:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmCjm-0000Ev-65; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmCjj-0000Do-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmCjj-00053O-GA; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:36:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=jB8xyYhRzDTig+nduTX2LQJCb9AdwlyVu8u8T6+oSoM=; b=TsvuxpG9YxMu 8UeQAP3GwzDh9qMs/vjN7W9qw9X8mJCpAW86WjyJ/V1vWK5M+lwwYieM0QoZk1OCwdlx9+24IBBL+ JK9sh7825ICi4bFNM5GAGTeClHkc82+mutrgUTv/nfqx7VW9XQBYFNIl2cNTByhteFGEQTvtWQlnm wS6htzkSjy7EmObXlfqAGniWuQtU1UasOoGfR67xtkVNsBv0rSBi63PrpbJBIX2nsO0aBpjw3ayyY fsTTRPrTs67mvHUWVI84IDoJdmhMZleCwnp+H72NxoBekm08tg6Nh7ylZgAB//jJYk9rvkKUnzM58 NBww7s80LMm+kCZA/PChVA==; Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmCjj-0007u7-9X; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:36:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?In-Reply-To=3A_=3C87h6ngd8or=2Efsf=40thaodan=2Ede=3E_=28message?= =?UTF-8?Q?_from_Bj=C3=83=C2=B6rn_Bidar_on_Tue=2C_26=0A=09Sep_2023_22=3A40?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3A52_+0300=29=0A?= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311150 Archived-At: The link you refer to doesn't contain any reference to site-lisp besides *lispdir*. I thought it was clear that I don't mean to define site-lisp but define a second site-lisp as you say your self. site-lisp lives under datadir, hence the reference. > That makes me ask the questions should there be a second site-lisp for > dynamic modules in by default? > > Are they architecture-dependent? Are they libraries or other object > files? Seems so, off the cuff sounds reasonable. Did you read the manual? I've read the manual many times, doesn't mean I remeber each thing in it. So please use a kinder tone, and assume that not everyone remebers everything. Yes dynamic modules are per definition architecture-dependent after they have been compiled as they use compiled languages such as C or C++.