From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:45:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411135259.zqrlngj6lmpgbsni@Ergus> <83ilrf6779.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411142519.vnbr63lfpyuqpw2w@Ergus> <20220412104823.xfquehpmoghektkt@Ergus> <20220412164016.y3qbycbbf5gwujuy@Ergus> <20220412174848.ftsa5q6sfkilzk6q@Ergus> <8f5db4aa-dbfa-a877-2205-e4c67ac81445@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 07:49:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neVse-0003jd-5F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 07:49:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neVsc-00074k-RD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neVpH-0005vQ-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neVpD-0000La-Iu; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:45:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=/N9Kbfn/HElKerYnSsmQVBbzcep4jAqhzMFVaf1XfyY=; b=sXG+kpmTiKrl AVYS3UL9JFh2vi5uJkCuKgJTHfbt0fRtGEKjPMYLd9MgtKZC2bdkh/iNof5JWROR1kedVpUH3Fubo lgc6g82aUCHalN+wFx/PZxBKi/78KwwuGtMdLk4J+fuf3vWCpib12D3ZcVBjaeIotfoUM7rCrgzIU LvvAcfdQk6dFy8Jeu2FqQMm14TqecZPjs3ccvTsbcML5uklvpdZn9O7y4FFkFU7xflJzcby6Wy1uf dMEIVfByZMtMC/8ci6fYgrQ8YiC9GjEXoRjHVGaqBQTcYLaWFNZfbk0GFk29gbMLkKHyHHRjsvOyf /cwxiijaPHTQp/iKCjJn9A==; Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neVp9-0004II-Ph; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:45:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8f5db4aa-dbfa-a877-2205-e4c67ac81445@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:49:52 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288347 Archived-At: I can understand trying to support a standard format, but for programs...? Programs relay on the standard format to be what it is. Would you also standardize Emacs and avoid adding new features because of that? Nobody said anything about avoiding new features.