From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:45:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411135259.zqrlngj6lmpgbsni@Ergus> <83ilrf6779.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411142519.vnbr63lfpyuqpw2w@Ergus> <20220412104823.xfquehpmoghektkt@Ergus> <87ilrewp5s.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9716"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 15:46:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neGr4-0002KY-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:46:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neGr3-0001iU-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neGpM-0000CH-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neGpM-00031D-Hk; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:45:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=MceENHDyB7ABsIa1gWDY/PKA5HM3FwFkgq1DX8SfnOI=; b=Dij2KYjinyXt 3ipB1mrplk+jMjU1w9RTSq2xaxVme1gveYtrOckD0bFbvCAI/yEwJmFGIU8oEJWKM4bwUQlQXoPjl BggE2AtO3z69hm+7hNQU0TJvjX34onHgM+eWTKlFe/nCEKfnKbFoqxhCbw5dIz9PbYQOqMwYqu2D5 GPRYHmwM5PCHi4dMFqA4rCI3scLHNig4Tkuwzm2pfNCCGZQRH1lki2/WawLcGTcBVbe7pOmpzDCZ8 VOkbs2EgmI5++mj7KzTKuXfsioh/Sd3dIqFJBv85vAcutPrGx/10fjoy+qOnbmZqyO3S8EkJn+H6f NnqK42wgm4Onyd3HaewSVw==; Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neGpM-00036R-B1; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:45:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ilrewp5s.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:51:11 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288303 Archived-At: > I use OpenBSD in my servers daily and all my team around use vim and > neovim with Universal Ctags with no issue. Universal ctags can generate > emacs tags, json, legacy and modern ctags, xref... if there is some > problem the right to do is to open an issue in their project... vim and neovim are not vi and mg, and are not standardized utilities either. vi(1) (and ex(1) which also accepts tags files) is standardized by POSX, FWIW