From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Repeat lambda Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:37:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87o8fhekvx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <385DDC1B-F508-4165-87FD-FFE2461348A6@kuaishou.com> <87ft0nyrfb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87blb969vc.fsf_-_@mail.linkov.net> <8FE23CF4-90D9-4633-9CCF-B1FDD24DABCE@kuaishou.com> <87mtul7tcs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87tuokjvf3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20210411234042.mls4zqid47zwlty3@Ergus> <87mtu3wjjf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fszuov1u.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12220"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, chenzhiwei03@kuaishou.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 14 07:38:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lWYE0-00032I-1h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:38:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWYDz-00047F-0c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWYDJ-0003gx-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWYDE-0007iO-8V; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lWYD7-0002pq-VB; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:37:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fszuov1u.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 13 Apr 2021 22:35:25 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268023 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Maybe 'C-x u u' could start such key sequence with the command 'undo', > then 'r' could switch to a different keymap > where 'r' is bound to 'undo-redo' and 'u' to 'undo-only'. > Perhaps such heuristics makes sense that once the user typed 'r', > the next 'u' should do 'undo-only'? C-x u is the recommended key sequence for novices to undo. Please do not make it more complex in any way. It would trip them up! -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)