From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:35:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7488"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 21 09:37:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lNta1-0001qu-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:37:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNta1-000606-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNtYj-0005PJ-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNtYj-0007y5-5A; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lNtYi-0007ZO-P4; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:35:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 21 Mar 2021 07:53:45 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266689 Archived-At: > May I suggest the attached, slightly more controversial, experimental > test? Removing `C-o' has already been suggested, and there's already been a lot of negative feedback on that, if I remember correctly. So I don't think there's much point in doing this experiment. I think there was less negative feedback about C-o than about removing M-o M-s and friends. Yet that was removed, and not even moved to another binding -- indeed, rather calls for keeping at least some where promptly ignored. Why not just remove all keybindings?