From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Experimentally unbind M-o on the trunk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:12:20 -0500
Message-ID: <E1l9rAC-0002pO-TW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8ed9b43502ae1480e06b@heytings.org>
 <E1l9l6l-0002Lr-6k@fencepost.gnu.org> <YCPzjukrsnvHV0RR@protected.rcdrun.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="38496"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: gregory@heytings.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 16:13:16 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l9rB6-0009u3-27
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:13:16 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l9rB5-0004pr-05
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:13:15 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50156)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1l9rAE-000431-Dt
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:12:22 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44988)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1l9rAD-0001QQ-SF; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:12:21 -0500
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1l9rAC-0002pO-TW; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:12:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <YCPzjukrsnvHV0RR@protected.rcdrun.com> (message from Jean Louis
 on Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:54:06 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264287
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/264287>

Sorry, I atleast have a hard time taking these suggestion to remap
long standing keybindings randomly seriously, likewise suggestions
that users should just resort to M-x or binding them themselves.

Might as well unbind all they keys and have a wizard query the user
the first time they start Emacs about what each interactive function
should be bound too.