From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:37:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> <838s83ra3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwjocn7.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuqrmncs.fsf@gnus.jao.io> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jao@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 03:38:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8DUX-0002DJ-3K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:38:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8DUW-0006Vh-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:38:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8DTx-00066d-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:37:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8DTw-0000a2-KT; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l8DTv-0007UR-K4; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:37:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:46:28 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264038 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Given that C-/ is undo, i would find it easier to remember C-x / as > > revert-buffer ("undo everything", if you look at it sideways :)) > > than any other proposed alternative. Perhaps we should make C-x / a prefix key. But I am not arguing for this (or any other choice). I am only mentioning it as an additional alternative. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)