From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:01:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2hhri3n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn2tkfg8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rf7ippu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6trg6mc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im8f951f.fsf@gnus.org> <83lfdacapo.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnwsbuwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtxo4tph.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtxobs41.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30268"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, stefankangas@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 06:04:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kx0zP-0007kn-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 06:04:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx0zO-0003Pz-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx0x9-0007ar-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx0x8-00049P-PY; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kx0ws-0002Z2-3S; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:01:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83mtxobs41.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 04 Jan 2021 18:10:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262567 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > I think the most natural person to manage the process would be the > > person that's proposing the change. That is, we don't really need much > > formalism around this. > I don't mind that, either, but what about people who submit changes, > but don't intend to stick around long enough to see this process > through? Someone will have to step in and do it for them. Before doing this time-boxed feature test, we would ask the people pushing for the change to accept the responsibility to follow it up, with a given schedule. If they don't want to do that, the test doesn't start. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)