From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recentish C-s M-y change Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:01:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <<87r1na4tyu.fsf@gnus.org>> <<87tus6tj7s.fsf@mail.linkov.net>> <<87a6txigm1.fsf@gnus.org>> <<874kk5lzew.fsf@mail.linkov.net>> <> <<87eej8ifll.fsf@mail.linkov.net>> <> <<87h7o3k5b5.fsf@mail.linkov.net>> <> <> <83wnwwg8iu.fsf@gnu.org> <837dovg687.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33307"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 07:04:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvwVG-0008Z1-Dk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 07:04:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvwVF-000757-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvwSg-0005jO-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvwSf-00040u-SU; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kvwSX-0005uo-GR; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:01:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <837dovg687.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:15:04 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262347 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Thus I propose a rule, which I hope people will remember to apply, > > that if a change in features has been discussed inside a thread > > about a specific bug, always to raise the issue on emacs-devel > > afterward. > As a guideline, I could agree. But as an enforced rule, I don't think > this will fly, and I don't think we should waste our limited resources > to try enforcing it. What is the sort of "enforcement" that seems so bad to you? Maybe I have no intention of doing that anyway. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)