From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:14:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4a1188f8-9864-54c0-ae6f-5f32102d9757@gmx.com> <20201011073553.GA6784@odonien.localdomain> <20201011120840.GC2923@protected.rcdrun.com> <20201011125031.GC6784@odonien.localdomain> <20201012050418.GZ2923@protected.rcdrun.com> <20201013052736.GE31408@protected.rcdrun.com> <20201016130235.06218dae@argon> <87eelvplvh.fsf@posteo.net> <10bdf4ea-e365-cc3d-ec03-4348946fadbe@yandex.ru> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22808"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mve1@runbox.com, philipk@posteo.net, bugs@gnu.support, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 07:16:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUk0Q-0005pT-BC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:16:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUk0O-0007jK-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUjz6-0006I3-HE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUjz6-0006fg-0R; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUjz4-0001Cs-Df; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:14:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <10bdf4ea-e365-cc3d-ec03-4348946fadbe@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:36:55 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258161 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > If we provide some well-defined criteria for such tags, and pick a > neutral-enough name, I don't see why the MELPA maintainers (who are > quite reasonable people IME) wouldn't go for it. > Question is, would you agree to add MELPA to the default list of package > archives if they do? I do not have confidence that this will be sufficient. Melpa has caused other problems (discussed here some months ago). -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)