From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:11:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83y2l97qll.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 17:12:05 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ6K-00086k-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:12:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39482 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ6J-0006Eg-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ5P-0005N1-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ5P-00047v-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kIZ5M-00019l-3g; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:11:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <83y2l97qll.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:17:58 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255890 Archived-At: > + On a graphics terminal, the easiest way to invoke @code{undo} is > +with @kbd{C-/}; that doesn't need the shift key. On a text terminal, > +@kbd{C-/} does not exist, but usually you can type @kbd{C-_} without > +the shift key and it will work anyway. > > That doesn't work on my terminal (wsvt25 or xterm with TERM=vt100); > where one has to press C-_ (shifted). C-- ignores the Control key, > and does a self-insert-command on ?-. Richard's text says "usually", so I guess it doesn't need to be correct always? I tried several more terminals, none of them worked with C-- -- usually usually means that it usually works -- at least sometimes.