From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:54:48 -0400
Message-ID: <E1kFf1E-000811-5y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com>
 <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus>
 <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru>
 <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default>
 <bcae72d9-04b1-8b78-f624-e16ffc450d59@yandex.ru>
 <E1kFWxU-0001Rk-RT@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="6520"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: nicola.manca85@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
 drew.adams@oracle.com, dgutov@yandex.ru
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 16:55:22 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFf1m-0001ay-JO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:55:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFf1l-0002Zh-B3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:55:21 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46198)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1kFf1F-00025T-TG
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:54:49 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41237)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFf1F-0002Ug-Dr; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:54:49 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFf1E-000811-5y; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:54:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 08
 Sep 2020 17:20:48 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254741
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/254741>

   >    undo-tree is superior.
   > 
   > That would make Emacs unusable for the majority of Emacs users.

   I believe this is an exaggeration.  Exaggerations aren't useful in
   discussion such as this one.

I would find it entierly unusable (I've tried it several times) and I
know several people who use Emacs would find the same, so I do not
find it at all an exaggeration.