From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:34 -0400
Message-ID: <E1kFKEw-0004BG-UT@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20200906163418.3p2wuygb4osm76wa@Ergus>
 <E1kF0OQ-00068P-8s@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <20200906203807.u237c3h22oxwtmba@Ergus>
 <E1kF2Zq-0003oQ-Km@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tuwabm5a.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83a6y2nwo1.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgbt939z.fsf@gnus.org>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2009071456580453.15496@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <20200907140332.ixzkgly2o5e7fmmb@Ergus>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2009071726430453.27953@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <20200907155447.b675o4idci5dpxxo@Ergus>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="27763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: ghe@sdf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 07 18:44:10 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFKFV-00076J-VE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:44:09 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51262 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFKFV-0004ZC-1J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:44:09 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50096)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1kFKF0-00049n-HM
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:38 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45484)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFKEx-0000UQ-Jt; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:36 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFKEw-0004BG-UT; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <20200907155447.b675o4idci5dpxxo@Ergus> (message from Ergus on
 Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:54:47 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254661
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/254661>

   >Or does "convert vanilla emacs in a "doomed like" experience" means 
   >"without using Doom Emacs, by doing everything by oneself"?  In that 
   >case it's not wrong, it is ridiculous.  Almost as ridiculous as if he 
   >had written "it would have taken me more time to develop Emacs by 
   >myself than to develop Visual Studio by myself".

   If a software we develop require a complex layer like doom (which could
   be seen as a big set of patches) to be "attractive" for many users. 

Emacs definitely doesn't require a complex layer like doom /
spaceemacs.