From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Modernize frame-title-format: "%b - GNU Emacs"
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1kBdzV-0006sF-Ha@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <CADwFkmnhA7TNqVpgG3jvPL+_33gYRwSK0z2ddvDpYXUu9qw-EQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1kBBSl-0007bb-1K@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmmP_CwHk48=v2YQVG3ODMQsBjcqqnGU_8H-pMsw_4irrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3sgc7mvh8.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
 <CADwFkmkOjpGh-=FKXkuX31Hcuzku3=QdHHXzRvtWs6gEkpAN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="18347"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 15:02:37 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kBe1d-0004gX-FL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:02:37 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48150 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kBe1c-0004l8-I0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:02:36 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44990)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1kBdzY-0003Ju-VD
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:30 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57224)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kBdzX-0008Ku-45; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:27 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kBdzV-0006sF-Ha; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <CADwFkmkOjpGh-=FKXkuX31Hcuzku3=QdHHXzRvtWs6gEkpAN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:18:21 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254353
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/254353>

   > and losing the invocation-name@system-name bit would be a significant
   > regression.

   You are the first person to say that `invocation-name' is important to
   keep.  Would like to expand on the use-case you have in mind, and why
   you think it is important to keep as the default?

I can think of one situation, when running multiple emacs:en of
different version.  E.g, development versions or when you wish to run
an older or newer version.