From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What is GNU ELPA?
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 04:24:41 -0400
Message-ID: <E1jZs7d-0007vs-67@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1jYBUR-0005xj-04@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com>
 <E1jYLOw-00046I-5q@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvblmt4xqq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1jYiWR-00014m-9D@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvsgg4t41j.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1jZ68Y-0006Ze-SC@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvlfluprar.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAGK7Mr4KK+6Firpgq7U=ahG0vXftjbrXsLzeA4XC=g71=kcsuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <07d7ff5d-dd57-00e7-933f-3188d57d6185@yandex.ru>
 <E1jZQsg-0008M6-Of@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <96f718b4-8ba9-7b9a-f940-7070e4a9a424@yandex.ru> <83sgg13cek.fsf@gnu.org>
 <096d8f50-3568-8f01-610f-65199c583358@yandex.ru> <83lflt1flx.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E1jZoF5-0004Bk-1Y@fencepost.gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="6682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: joostkremers@fastmail.fm, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
 pcr910303@icloud.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, eliz@gnu.org,
 phillip.lord@russet.org.uk
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 16 10:25:45 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZs8e-0001Hp-EJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:25:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZs8K-0003AI-2J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 04:25:24 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53734)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1jZs7g-0002Ho-QU
 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 04:24:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32891)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZs7f-0005OA-2S; Sat, 16 May 2020 04:24:43 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZs7d-0007vs-67; Sat, 16 May 2020 04:24:41 -0400
In-reply-to: <E1jZoF5-0004Bk-1Y@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
 Stallman on Sat, 16 May 2020 00:16:07 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250463
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/250463>

     > >    GNU packages that are available for use with Emacs, but are
     > > distributed separately from Emacs itself, for reasons of space, etc
     > > 
     > > They are indeed "available to use" and "distributed separately".

     > But only "for reasons of space, etc.".

   As I understand it, space is the only reason that we don't
   put all those packages in the core.

Wouldn't it mean that if is a mainly a space issue, then all the
things in ELPA should also be held to the same standards as the rest
of GNU Emacs?