From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 00:07:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> <83d07984ux.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0l6kgd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="127333"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joostkremers@fastmail.fm, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pcr910303@icloud.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 13 06:08:44 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYihI-000X0a-0c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:08:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46212 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYihH-00040f-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYig3-0001qa-C3 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:07:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYig3-0001ho-0S; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:07:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYifs-0007wh-RL; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:07:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83tv0l6kgd.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 12 May 2020 22:07:30 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250092 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Do we have a mechanism to declare that a package is not intended to be > brought into core, unless changed to follow the same standards and > guidelines as the core does? If not, can we come up with such a > mechanism? A package that is thus declared can then be exempt from > some of the requirements (we still need to agree on which ones, > though). For that purpose, we need to determine that we _certainly_ don't want to bring a certain package into the core. If we made this decision for package P, we could forego assignments for P. The hard part is not _saying_ that, but how we would decide about that conclusion. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)