From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:18:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default> <87wo5mc04t.fsf@fastmail.fm> <835zd5h6tq.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8qwc88b.fsf@russet.org.uk> <10d29f2d-7e6f-4bda-a14f-cab968520482@default> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="94709"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joostkremers@fastmail.fm, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 12 05:19:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLSH-000OXs-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 05:19:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLSG-0003Ex-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:19:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLRV-00020k-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLRT-0004wr-Tr; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYLRQ-0004c9-PG; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:18:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <10d29f2d-7e6f-4bda-a14f-cab968520482@default> (message from Drew Adams on Mon, 11 May 2020 08:05:24 -0700 (PDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249927 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > If you want to suggest Clojure, then `cloj-' or `clj-' > is better than `clos-'. The "s" is for "string" or "s.el". "Clo" is for Clojure. I don't see a shorter prefix to stand for "Clojure". There are other ok choices which are longer. For instance, "clo-s-". If it is really more Ruby than Clojure, it could be 'rubs-'. Or 'rubys-' or 'rus-'. Or 'rub-s-'. If the 'shorthand.el' approach works, maybe we won't need this prefix to be short. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)